The Athenian Empire The Athenian Empire: Tireless History
by Greg Grillot
Whiskey & Gunpowder
Annapolis, USA
January 15, 2006 Greg Grillot discusses the Peloponnesian War, the last days of the Athenian Empire, and wonders whether all mature democracies behave that way . . . Greg's note: On Friday night, James Boric and I trucked down to Annapolis to hear a lecture given at my dear alma mater, St. John's College. Taken alone, this fact sleeps unremarkably. But -- consonant serendipities surround this jaunt and Whiskey. You see, Dan Denning also graduated from this school, as did the Daily Reckoning's Addison Wiggin. Interesting, but the interwoven threads stop not there. The fellow speaking last night, Dr. Karl Walling, in addition to being a fellow "Johnnie," teaches at the Naval War College...where, you guessed it, Byron King speaks on a regular basis. Freaky confluence. So, without further ado, below I shall post my short, question laden interpretation of Dr. Wallis' speech entitled "Democracies at War." This essay is my corollary to Byron's previous missive called "War and Empire." Please e-mail your meta-managing editor here: greg@whiskeyandgunpowder.com Tireless History "I have written my work, not as an essay which is to win the applause of the moment, but as a possession for all time." ~ Thucydides, History of the Peloponnesian War, I.22
QUITE AN AMBITIOUS task he set for himself. But then, an inherent duty of all historians may be to give to all time. Thus, I will humbly attempt to suss out some contemporary parallels for Thucydides' fine work on the first recorded "World War" between Athens and Sparta. I'll leave the final answers to you. But first, we must add some enriching background detail to Thucydides' subject. (Please refer to this below map for geography.) 
After repelling the Persian attack on the Greek mainland, the Greeks formed the Delian League in 478 BC to contribute to a common standing naval defense against further Persian incursion. Athens, by far the strongest member city of the Delian League, lusted to transform the league into an Athenian Empire. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~Special~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
America Leads the World to Financial Ruin That's what the greatest living economist proved in his latest report. And he should know. This 87-year-old World War II vet predicted the decline of the dollar in the 1970s, the deficit consequences of supply-side Reaganomics in the 1980s, the U.S. recession of the early 1990s, the credit bubble of the late 1990s and the current trend of stagflation in June 2004, before all the pundits jumped on the bandwagon.
Now he's calling for the largest financial event in U.S. history. But be warned... This report is only for those who can handle the real economic truth. http://www.isecureonline.com/Reports/RCH/ERCHG112/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ (Here an implicit question springs up: When and why do Democracies become Empires?) The Athenian Empire: Creating the Athenian Empire Over the next few decades, Athens succeeded in creating its own Empire from the ashes of a willing coalition. Athens took many of the member cities' ships as tribute and so amassed an enormous standing navy. And eventually, under Pericles, Athens moved the common treasury of the league from the island of Delos over to Athens and proceeded to use the vast majority of forced tribute from the member states to build such luminary monuments as the Parthenon. This imperial swagger angered many of the Greek cities, including Sparta, which had the strongest land-army in Greece. On top of worrying Sparta herself, Athens deeply offended the two key Spartan allies of Corinth and Megara. First, Athens prevented the Corinthian invasion of Corcyra. Then, she placed economic sanctions on the key city of Megara, which sat on the only landbridge between Athens and Sparta. Wary of encroaching Empire and insulted by offenses to its allies, what could Sparta do? Attack the Attican lands surrounding Athens. So started the war - but let's take a look at its eventual end. Fast forward through many deadly battles and a failed peace. Neither of these powers can concede to a mutually compromising truce. After a grueling 27 years, Athens finally lost, nearly starving and without a navy. And the main factor in their eventual defeat is widely seen as the failed Sicilian expedition. 17 years into the war, Athens made the decision to attack the Sicilian city of Syracuse, a Spartan ally over 1,000 miles away. Ironically, Syracuse was the second largest democratic city in the world. A young, brash general named Alcibiades was the main catalyst for this expedition. He may have wanted to harness and surpass the Imperial notions of the great Pericles, who died from the plague early on in the war. Alcibiades headed up the enormous expedition along with Nicias, a pious and more responsible general who might buffer the young and impetuous Alcibiades. A third general, Lamachus, rounded out the trio of command. If Athens could take Syracuse, and then the entire island of Sicily, she could subsume an enormous navy and pilfer enough riches to allow for a virtually eternal war with Sparta. And, of course, the second largest democracy in the world makes a fine addition to any grasping Empire. But the Sicilian expedition turned into an enormous failure. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Special~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
How to Crush Google.com by 500%...GUARANTEED Now that you've heard every wannabe on Wall Street wax on about the 253% gain coughed up by the most talked about IPO in 5 years... Let me offer you a chance to lock in "Google-Crushing" gains of at least 253% or more at least 6 times over the 12 months ahead...or your money back. Guaranteed! http://www.isecureonline.com/Reports/GRP/EGRPG110/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Here's a quick rundown of why...Athens called Alcibiades back to face impiety charges early in the expedition. Fearing execution or ostracism, he turned traitor and sailed over to Sparta to inform them of the details of the expedition he engineered. Naturally, Sparta headed over to protect Syracuse and thwart Athenian imperialism. Nicias and Lamachus hesitated in key points of battle, due to indecision and superstition, and key points of advantage slipped through their fingers. And finally, right before the Athenians could finish a wall that would choke off Syracuse, the Spartan force arrived. Nicias and Lamachus both died in the ensuing battles. The Spartans blockaded the Athenian navy in the port and crushed the entire fleet. Half of the Athenian navy was lost, and almost 5,000 of their troops. This crushing defeat was the catalyst for another ten grueling years of war. And finally, after losing all but twelve of their ships at the battle of Aegospotami, the Athenians starved under a Spartan blockade. So they surrendered to the Spartans in 404 BC. The Athenian Empire: The Nature of the War at Hand Why did the Athenians lose the war? Trying to answer that question might be valuable to those living or ruling in a democracy. Could we learn something about our present war? First we must try to understand the nature of the war at hand - what are the strengths and weaknesses of our enemies? Those questions are difficult and complex, but we have three angles to attack them from: 1) We can try to understand the political structures of the belligerents
2) We can try to understand the structure of the international environment
3) We can try to understand the goals of the belligerents, and how they will try to achieve those goals Sign Up for Whiskey & Gunpowder
Whiskey & Gunpowder covers the spectrum of the many factors that affect economics, including, but not limited to, politics, technology, nature, history, and anything else our writers could possibly dream up. Sign up FREE today! We will not share your email address with anyone else, period.
-Andrew Palmer, Director E-commerce Marketing
We Value Your Privacy |
Was the restless and overreaching spirit of Athens unique? Or is it a symptom of mature democracies that turn toward Empire? Why expand the Empire through belligerence rather than looking to perfect the state inwardly? Expand for the sake of expansion itself? Can an Empire's appetite ever have satiety, or does every morsel gulped induce a newer, more monstrous and uncontrollable hunger?
With Democracy and equality of opportunity sprouts a fertile hope. Hope to achieve more than you have, to achieve more than your forebears achieved for you, to achieve more and more so you can pass it on to your children. Add that to the Greek desire to have a Zeus-like dominion over everything, including the fellow gods, to the point of devouring them, eternally crippling them and maybe even raping their human wives. Quite savage to modern folk, but those "ugly ideals" formed a part of the Greek ethos. Could it be that a voracious Democratic Empire might exhibit some Zeus-like thunderbolts? I won't answer the above questions in regard to present-day America. I leave that to you, if you're interested. I merely peer backstage and rustle the curtains - you're free to write or act in the play. As are G.W. Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, Ahmadinejad, Syria, Pakistan, Israel, etc. "I have written my work, not as an essay which is to win the applause of the moment, but as a possession for all time." ~ Thucydides, History of the Peloponnesian War, I.22
Regards,
Greg Grillot P.S. I thank Dr. Walling and Byron for asking me to analyze this ancient war and think these thoughts. But the above essay is my own interpretation, and those fellows hold no responsibility for it. Headline(s) of the week: "Deficit Could Top $400 Billion" ~ Washington Post "China's Conundrum Tops Greenspan's Riddle" ~ Bloomberg "Oblivious on pension issues? Better wake up" ~ Houston Chronicle Quote of the week: "With close to a 5-year average life, the entire U.S. bond market can be compared to a 5-year fixed swap. That means that companies, homeowners, and consumers that have borrowed money in recent years - (and purchased assets such as a home that are akin in my example to a 5-year swap) - are now being squeezed in a flat yield curve environment. Visualize a real life example in which you have "financed" a home with an adjustable rate mortgage (in my example you finance a 5-year swap with floating 3-month Libor). As the cost of the ARM increases with higher short rates, your excess income available to spend on discretionary items begins to shrink. If that ARM rate goes too high, you hunker down even more by not eating out, going to movies, or taking a vacation to exotic destinations. The economy in other words slows down." ~ Bill Gross Chart of the week: 
This time next year, you could have doubled your money.
In fact, if you don't do so 12 times in the next 12 months, we'll give you a FULL REFUND.
The man's name is Steve Sarnoff. The time frame is one year. The profits are guaranteed.
Don't miss a single alert. Click here now. http://www.isecureonline.com/Reports/OHL/EOHLG102 | 
