Comments on: Executive Order 10-988

By: jay moses

jay moses — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:17:02 +0000

all due respect, Linda, but I think you owe your readers a higher degree of accuracy than this article displays.
Tim F. is quite correct. Exacutive order 10998 was revoked by Nixon in 1969.
there’s enough horrifying, scary sh-t to worry about for real. No need to ressurect dead executive orders from 40 years ago.

By: Flip

Flip — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:02:01 +0000

I think that the blame game and the choice of writing as a southern belle only does the serious nature of this a disservice.
I do not mean to piss you off by pointing this out but this is something I am concerned about and wish more people would look into. If this were all you read what would you make of this and keep in mind most readers know nothing about you.

By: Rancher Lady

Rancher Lady — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 02:14:29 +0000

Dear Rick:

Thanks for the comment. I’m a merry little soul, and my first thought was that any South’n Belle worth her salt, no matter what her age, who cain’t git uh man tuh do what she wants should turn in her bustle! You put a passel of sojers in mah house an’ by th’ tahm they’ve had a a bunch of motherin’ and are calling me “Mom-Mom,” as all my son’s friend always (sorry, “allus!”) did an’ dang if’n Ah don’ believe they’d keep they hans’ offuh great-grannie’s silver and not slaughter the goats.

Unfortunately, this ISN’T funny. There is a concerted, deliberate attack on our ability to feed America and our ability to feed ourselves through what we can grow and even what you could kill hunting.

Charges of “hoarding” are always lurking, and there is serious discussion that no citizen should have more than two weeks’ worth of food in the house. It’s bad enough that assorted “taxing authorities” think that much of what you have is THEIRS, but when it comes to telling you that you can’t accumulate during temporary price drops with the half they left you of your paycheck, that is far beyond the pale.

The Constitution is under increasing attack, and if it comes to martial law I wouldn’t be at all surprised if someone came up with the bright idea of saving money by quartering troops on us, particularly here in the country.

By: Tim F

Tim F — Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:36:17 +0000

Wasn’t EO 10998 revoked by EO11490?
At least that is what it says here:

http://www.disastercenter.com/laworder/11490.htm

By: rick.s

rick.s — Sat, 21 Mar 2009 00:53:30 +0000

The last sentence was the best. Maybe that’s why there is a third amendment.