How the United States Inflated the World
Nov 30th, 2009 | By Fred Sheehan | Category: Featured, Macro EconomicsAfter the United States discarded the gold standard, the dollar remained the worlds reserve currency. Trade around the world was still conducted in dollars even though it had depreciated against most currencies. This created havoc. Exporters to the United States received the depreciated dollars for their goods. OPEC (the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries), an exporter of oil to the United States, received less value for each gallon of oil exported. (The dollar fell about 50 percent against other currencies during the 1970s. This varied, depending on the foreign currency, and requires many qualifications.) Since OPEC could buy fewer goods for each gallon of oil sold, it wanted more dollars for the exchange.
Another example, the trade loop between the United States and Germany, presented a similar problem for Volkswagen. When an American bought a Volkswagen, the dollars wound their way to Volkswagens headquarters in Germany. (This is a hypothetical case, with no knowledge of how Volkswagen operated.) The automobile manufacturer did not want dollars. It shipped them to the German central bank (the Bundesbank). In return, Volkswagen received deutschmarks at the appropriate exchange rate.
Americans were spending much more abroad than at home. Since dollars in circulation in Europe were rising in relation to deutschmarks spent on good from the United States, cars from abroad cost more: Americans were paying for goods with less valuable dollars. The German government did not want its exporters to suffer. The Bundesbanks dollar-deutschmark transaction with Volkswagen increased the German money supply. This slowed the rise of the deutschmarks value against the dollar, but also increased German domestic inflation. In fact, the excess dollars led to inflation around the world.
This flood of dollars led to price inflation in the 1970s. More recently, the flood of dollars has led to asset inflation, including the worldwide housing bubble.
The Federal Reserves Inflation Calculation
Arthur Burns [Chairman of the Federal Reserve 1970-1978ed.]followed the most expeditious route to tame inflation: changing how the measure was calculated. Stephen Roach was a young economist at the Federal Reserve. After oil prices quadrupled, Arthur Burns instructed his staff to calculate a CPI stripped of energy costs. Burnss rationale was the blazing Yom Kippur War, over which the Fed had no control. Why the Federal Reserves influence should matter in how the rate of consumer price inflation is calculated could be better understood by reading memoirs of the Nixon administration than by studying Arthur Burnss seminal textbook, Measuring Business Cycles.
Roach recalls: Alas, it didnt turn out to be quite that simple. Burns thought the disappearance of anchovies off the Peruvian coast caused food costs to rise. They too were removed from the price index. Next went used cars, childrens toys, jewelry, and housingabout half the costs that consumers absorbed in their daily struggle with rising prices.
Today, three decades after the anchovy shortage, without much ado from the economics guild, the media announces the monthly ex-food, ex-energy CPI, produced by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This gently rising CPIa charadehas compounded at a much lower rate than the true costs paid by Americans. This is one reason the collapse in living standards among the lower half remains a mystery to those who trust government press releases and the media that report them.
The science of economics as applied to national statistics was (and is) more a confiscation of the truth than a midwife to it. Incumbent and future politicians, including future Fed chairman Greenspan, introduced and nurtured such hullabaloo as hedonics and the birth-death rate in the highly publicized but little understood calculations of economic growth rates and unemployment numbers. The figures were a disgrace, and so were the parties responsible for their introduction and dissemination. Greenspans turn at the Council of Economic Advisers was to be a screen test for a future role in the charade, a dress rehearsal for his political, acting and dissembling talents, the inestimable qualities needed by a Fed chairman in an economy that was rocketing off its moorings.
In any case, numbers cannot capture inflation, which generally works hand in hand with deterioration.
Regards,
Frederick J. Sheehan
Panderer to Power





ShareThis
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ron Simon and Agora Financial, Whiskey Gunpowder. Whiskey Gunpowder said: How the United States Inflated the World: After the United States discarded the gold standard, the dollar remain… http://bit.ly/8v2h33 [...]
What’s happening to this site? It used to have several interesting and informative posts a week, but lately output has slowed to a crawl. Now we get this drivel. Was Sheehan in such a rush that he couldn’t bother proof-reading his submission?
Awful.
Dear Ehhhhh: I’m with you.
Whatever happened to old-fashioned editors (like moi) who EDIT? This bit is worse than you know if you did not see it originally on what we call “the send,” the original issue from W&G which includes the almost invariably glorious Parting Shot, an editorial (and/or readers’ letters) Gary Gibson writes. Unless I am sadly mistaken, this hunk was lifted from the book Mr. Sheehan wrote, meaning that the mistakes were passed by his publisher originally. We do not edit (other than mentally!) published works, although it is fair to put (sic) after a mistake in recognition that we saw it.
For technical reasons which baffle me, text cannot be altered on W&G after it leaves Gary’s desk and goes to the mysterious realms where it is put in a different medium to put it on line. Errors creep in magically there, from time to time. Short of comparing what we have to the original (and I don’t want to read Panderer to Power badly enough to do so), there is no easy way to ascertain to whom the errors should be attributed. From time to time, just to tease Gary, I make corrections in blue to mimic the classic blue pencil.
Regards, Linda