Road Trip Through Montgomery: The Collapse of Consumerism and Suburbia

Feb 5th, 2009 | By James Howard Kunstler | Category: Featured, Macro Economics
leadimage

“We will not apologize for our way of life….”

This unfortunate phrase from President Obama’s otherwise sturdy inaugural address, echoed through my mind last week as I cruised the suburban outlands of Montgomery, Alabama. All the usual commercial furnishings of consumerist America hugged the flattish ochre and dusty-green landscape of played-out cotton fields where thirty feet of topsoil has washed away in the two hundred years since the mainly English settlers shoved out the native Alabamu, Coosa, and Tallapoosa. Along the low horizon, mall followed strip mall followed “lifestyle center,” book-ending the “one house” failed subdivisions of otherwise empty unsold lots in a cavalcade of floundering enterprise. It seemed at times as if the terrain was a kind of sea-like expanse, and all the retail boxes ghost ships drifting to oblivion.

They say that the banks have stopped calling in their loans on the commercial real estate, even though the owners of the malls and strip malls have arrived firmly in default. Calling in the loans would only pin another horrifying liability on the banks’ balance sheets. So all parties join in a game of “pretend,” that nothing has really happened to the fundamental equations of business life. Something similar goes on at the next level down, where the tenants of the malls and strip malls sink deeper into rent arrears every month, and the eviction process is simply postponed, while the stores themselves put off paying their vendors and suppliers – as the whole system, the whole way of life, enters upon a circle-jerk of mutual denial in a last desperate effort to forestall the mandates of reality.

How long will these games go on? This is the primary question that haunts the republic as we wait for new TARPS, and “bad banks,” economic stimulus packages, infrastructure renewal roll-outs, and other policy life-lines thrown out in guarded hopefulness to haul America out of a ditch.

The center of Montgomery was instructive, too. Not unlike any other city in the USA (pop. about 200,000), the former main artery of downtown commerce – Dexter Avenue, rolling out like a red carpet below the state capitol hill, where Martin Luther King’s early career kicked off in a modest red brick church, and where Rosa Parks famously refused to move to the back of her bus – this “main street” presented a sad sequence of  empty shopfronts interrupted here and there by rather creepy amateur murals depicting the cruelties of slavery, as if a remonstrance to the politicos up the hill. Most of the buildings lining the avenue still stood burdened by the clownish facade re-doos and ghastly claddings of the 1950s, which had replaced the ordered classical-vernacular decorum of the original 19th century frontages. Once the malls had landed in the old cotton fields, and MLK moved on to Atlanta, Dexter Avenue was just left to rot in the memory trunk.

Here and there around the rest of the downtown, other weird experiments in American post-war anti-urbanism presented themselves, most notably a “building” designed to look like a small-scaled Death Star, all black reflective glass, canted concrete and steel walls – which turned out to belong to Morris Dees’ renowned Southern Poverty Law Center — deployed directly across the street from the modest white clapboard-with-green-shutters house once occupied by Jefferson Davis after Richmond fell and the Confederate leadership skeedaddled further south. There were a few recently-built government towers that looked like Nascar trophies. But the rest of the downtown – the parts not dedicated to surface parking – was the ubiquitous array of muffler shops, or restaurants and churches that looked like muffler shops.

With the city center thus nearly dead, and the asteroid belt of malls and strips on their knees financially, this emblematic Sunbelt metro area finds itself in a pickle. Cotton being well-past decline, and having wrecked the soil, the “new” economy of recent decades dedicated itself to building car-dependent air-conditioned suburban sprawl – the perceived perfect antidote to a previous economic order based on serfdom, hook-worm, and inescapable heat. That now-not-so-new economy of sprawl, in turn, has come to a screeching halt, as a cruel destiny threw sand in the mechanisms of reliably cheap oil and revolving credit, and the gears seized up. A mood of ominous watching and waiting pervaded the city, but many of the movers-and-shakers had pinned their hopes on the chance that Mr. Obama’s stimulus bill would allow them to commence building a new freeway to the ocean on the Florida panhandle.

My journey continued on the Jesus-haunted blue highways, to that selfsame place, Walton County, Florida, where some of the most famous experiments in the New Urbanism were conducted beginning in the 1980s with the new town of Seaside. I had been there many times over the years, and I was called down to get a prize in the service of the movement, but it was a little disconcerting to see how the build-out had progressed.

The Seaside experiment began very modestly as the idea for a bohemian village of architects and artists in what was then an almost empty quarter of piney woods owned by the St Joe timber company. Seaside was designed so beautifully that it attracted the attention of every thoracic surgeon and corporate lawyer between Nashville and New Orleans, and pretty soon Seaside became the Riviera of the Sunbelt’s economic elite – and came in for gales of criticism for becoming that. The newer houses and commercial structures grew ever grander, as a Boomer generation status competition ramped up into the new millennium. Several more, ever-grander New Urbanist towns sprouted along the adjacent beaches, some of the most recent composed of immense mansions embarrassing in their opulence. The outcome was a little scary, especially now that the fortunes behind many of these mansions may be threatened by the multiplying fiascos of finance and economy overspreading the nation like a vicious plague.

The New Urbanists had not set out to build monuments to Yuppie-Boomer consumerism, but a peculiar destiny shoved them into that role for a while – even while they toiled elsewhere around the nation to reform town planning laws and generally provide an antidote to the fatal cultural cancer of sprawl, that is, of a settlement pattern guaranteed to comprehensively bankrupt our society. Anyway, the collapse of the housing bubble has affected the New Urbanists’ business, too, and this may turn out to be a very good thing because they can put aside the distractions of building very grand places to sop up ill-gotten wealth and focus on the issues that Mr. Obama’s people should have been paying attention to all along, namely, how are we going to reform the way we live in this country and what will be the physical manifestation of how we live in the decades to come.

The New Urbanists have preached for years that conventional suburbia would fail America in the long run, and that we’d have to prepare for this failure by restoring traditional modes of occupying the landscape. So far, the Obama team has not been willing to identify the suburban system as the heart of our economic problem. They can’t recognize it for what it truly is: a living arrangement with no future – and an economic, ecological, and spiritual disaster. It is, of course, the primary reason why we find ourselves in the deadly predicament of importing over two-thirds of the oil we use every day.

But then, more than half the population lives the suburban way of life, with its deadly mortgage traps, its mandatory motoring, and its civic disengagements. Nobody in power dares tell the truth: that we can’t live this way anymore.

But there are scores of places like Montgomery, Alabama, and thousands of traditional main street small towns that are sitting out there waiting to be re-activated. We need to do this much more than we need to build new freeways to the beach. Suburbia is not going to be abandoned overnight (even if it fails logistically and economically!) but we have got to arrive at a consensus about rehabilitating our forsaken small cities and small towns. The New Urbanists have gathered, organized, and codified all the principle and methodology needed to carry out this campaign. This should be their moment. Mr. Obama and his team should get with the program.

Regards,
James Howard Kunstler

February 5, 2009

Author Image for James Howard Kunstler

James Howard Kunstler

James Howard Kunstler is perhaps best known for The Long Emergency, which predicted the financial meltdown and the implications of the peak oil problem. The Geography of Nowhere , about the fiasco of suburbia, is a campus cult classic among the architecture and urban planning students. It was followed by a sequel, Home From Nowhere and The City in Mind: Notes on the Urban Condition . Mr. Kunstler has also authored 10 novels including World Made By Hand, a story set in America’s post-oil future. His articles have appeared in The New York Times, The Washington Post, Rolling Stone and The Atlantic Monthly.

SPECIAL REPORTThe Endless PAYCHECK PORTFOLIO: In three simple steps, unleash a steady flow of work-free income… starting with up to 75 automatic “paychecks” deposited directly into your account.

Related Articles

Tags: , , ,
Print This Post Print This Post

10 comments
Leave a comment »

  1. The New Urbanists have gathered, organized, and codified all the principle and methodology needed to carry out this campaign.

    Oh, I’ll bet they have. Got a solution that doesn’t involve anointed philosopher-kings deciding for the rest of us… “overfed clowns,” I believe was the term Kunstler used?

  2. Mr Kunstler, you have a great talent for portraying dystopia in the written word. Keep up the good work.

  3. Heh heh. “Overfed clowns”…one of my favorites…

  4. Spent most of my lifie in towns of a few thousand. Now wherever there is good crop land you have corporate farming. The family farmer is mostly a thing of the past. Now you take marginal land and moderate climate and sure you have rural. Cities and suburbs made official with two events:

    1. Eisenhower and the Interstate Highway System: Great for trucks. Actually, the system isolated most of the land area of the U.S. . No proximity to Interstate and … remember all those westerns about where the train tracks went? Literally, the same. God, how many towns stole the county records and declared themselves the county seat — even into the 60’s. Result = Cities and Interstate. You want to husband the sod, Suburbs.

    2. Reagan announcing thath the U.S. was now a Sevice Economy and going to stay that way. The Ultimate Supply Side — and the overlords pulled it off. At the top you can have anything, but earn a good wage and your overpaid. I’m serious. So what you gonna do? Hang around cause credit was your pay and the top’s tool. Nobody did anything. Military gets a half trillion no matter what, and yet we won’t keep up the school buildings. Actually we don’t even like “public” schools ( Inner City and rural aren’t they ). And the teachers are alright but for their Union which has destroyed the system as the UAW has the auto manufacturers. You know in the 50’s you could send your kids to a state university with a union construction job or a south side steel plan job. Now you both work and it adds up to less.

    Now we have President Obama and he has apparently agreed to do things Wall Street’s Way. And so between Walstreet, the Public, the Congress we’ll have a Wall Street short of $ — probably just as well, cause it is possible these Investment “Institutions” are too big to bail. Bleak, interesting, wish so many wouldn’t end up getting hurt.

  5. Were you so caught up in prose that you couldn’t tell those “creepy depictions of slavery” were actually done by a single artist of mostly Christian themes? The artist did this, free of charge, to decorate the ‘decay’, which has in the last 5 years has mightily improved. Such as…

    Eleven million invested to restore a 1920’s warehouse into a minor league stadium (crowds have increased each year); another $10m or so into the old Greystone hotel for the first new hotel in 14 years; another $30m into one across the street that didn’t want to miss out on the party which included doubling the size of the Civic Center, adding a performing arts center which we’d NEVER had previously. (Notice it didn’t migrate to “mall fringe” either.)

    Plus, an alleyway was opened – leaving historical buildings intact – to draw tourists through and into formerly-decayed structures, now restored, housing a Learning Center (open date May 09) a restaurant (4,000 square feet of nastiness, now restored under “SmartCode” measures for preservation and utility) and offices. Wonder if you caught a glimpse of the 3 story former Montgomery Fair building, (where Rosa Parks worked), that now holds 19 loft apartments, all filled before restoration was completed just 60 days ago.

    Sorry if downtown Montgomery wasn’t impressive enough for you, but to those of us who live, work, and invest here, we’re encouraged.

  6. Remaking our society based on scarcity of energy resources is a losers game. Advanced nuclear energy can last, yes, forever, at 1000 times the energy usage rate we have now. Mr. Kunstler, your peak oil anxiety fails to account for human ingenuity. Hold off on completely redesigning my world. I like malls, cars and suburbs just fine, thank you, and so do most Americans. Seaside is expensively nice, but Montgomery, while maybe less aesthetically pleasing, gets lots of people well-fed and adequately housed where 100 years ago they were living in shacks eating a inadequate diet. Progress can and should be prettier and more energy efficient(keep working on that please), but don’t sneer at Montgomery for making the best of a difficult situation. New Urbanism: how ironic with its million dollar condos , how elitist with its expensive Priuses, how intellectually bankrupt with its main premise based on energy scarcity.

  7. New Urbanist development is expensive because of market forces. People want it and it’s in limited supply. The New Urbanist don’t “want” it to be expensive; they want more of it and for it to become the norm.

    Remember, what they are designing is nothing really new. It’s how human beings learned to design communities before everyone was expected to drive everywhere to everything, everytime.

    Mr. Kunstler is also a proponent of nuclear energy…at least last I checked. He has no illusions about the fact that nuclear is the only way to pull our fat out of the fryer.

  8. That’s fine, Gary. If oil really does become scarce, the market ought to drive community design. But Kunstler explicitly called upon President Obama to invoke the power of the Almighty State to make manifest the New Urbanist dream. If that isn’t a rent-seeker’s wet dream, I don’t know what is.

  9. Kunstler also repeatedly points out that communities will simply ignore the body of regulation that currently makes traditional, walkable design illegal. If that isn’t the market at work, I don’t know what is.

  10. Well, to give the argument its due, I confess I’m not familiar with regulations that make walkable design illegal. This is possibly due to the fact that I live in an inner-ring suburb of Cleveland that is at least adequately walkable as it stands. It’s got sidewalks, anyway. :-) Before that, I lived in Cleveland proper, which also would be walkable, if anyone could be bothered to shovel the sidewalks after we get a foot of fresh global warming, but that’s another story.

    To get back to the point, I wouldn’t blame a community that chose — on a local basis — to ignore such regulations. I’m gonna take a wild stab and say that we’re talking about zoning peculiarities, subdivisions with three- or five-acre minimum lot sizes, and the like. I don’t have The Geography of Nowhere, but there’s a library copy of The Long Emergency at home. I’ll see whether Mr. Kunstler addresses the question there. Be a lot easier to work with if he’d provide a reference list, the way Crichton (may he rest in peace) did.

Leave Comment

By submitting your comment you agree to adhere to our comment policy.