What can we discern about the incoming Obama administration? I had a long talk with an old friend who is a self-described “rabid Democrat.” Let me rephrase that. He’s a rabid Democrat in the way that Pittsburgh Steelers team owner Dan Rooney is a rabid football partisan. This friend of mine loves his Democratic Party. Just as Mr. Rooney wants his Steelers to win the Super Bowl, this guy’s focus in life is for his political tribe to do what’s right for the country. This friend of mine is also privy to the inner circles of Democratic politics. He’s just plain plugged in. He’s on a first-name basis with many on Team Obama.

So what’s on Obama’s plate? “Well, the first thing the new group has to do is stabilize the banking system,” he told me. “Things are still precarious with the banks. Liabilities exceed assets by a large margin. We will probably see more bank failures — small and even some large banks. That would hurt worldwide investor confidence and lead the stock markets down. We could test the old lows of last fall.”

This Democrat insider then got into other issues. “The housing crunch still has more rope to hang out, as well. A lot of the problem is isolated in a few states and regions of states — California, Arizona, southern Florida, the New York City metropolitan area, Massachusetts and a few other places. But it affects a lot of people. We’re dealing with populous, overbuilt places. We are also on the cusp of a lot of failures of government entities, from localities and school districts to counties. We’re going to have a lot of municipal bond defaults. We’re going to see municipal bankruptcies. Some large states are insolvent. California can’t meet payroll.”

And there’s more from this guy. “The next big wave will be that consumer spending dries up. This will lead to a failure of retail businesses all over the country. It’s going to be a huge unwinding. We spent the past 25 years spending more than we could afford. Now we as a nation have to pay some big bills. It’s time to save. It’s a good thing, in the big scheme, for people to save. But it’s going to put a lot of pain into the retail sector of the economy. We’ve overbuilt retail, and everything that goes with it. Too many stores. Too many buildings. Too much inventory. Too much shipping capacity. Too many containerships unloading too much stuff made in China and elsewhere. And a lot of people are going to lose jobs. I mean a lot of people. Everywhere.”

“The Next Two Years Are Going to Stink”

Here’s more from the Democrat insider. “The next two years are going to stink for the economy. Obama will face one financial crisis after another. He’s going to hate Wall Street. He’s going to hate bankers. Every time he turns around, the money people are going to be screwing him. He’ll try to fix one problem, and five more problems will spring up like weeds. (“Only five?” I asked.)

“The coming financial issues will test the ability of the legislative branch to act with integrity in the face of a media-driven clamor. States will be lining up to borrow money from the feds just to pay unemployment compensation, let alone to fund Medicaid and road maintenance. It will test the legal system as well. Expect more petty crime and a lot more bankruptcy. But fewer people will get divorced. Who can afford that anymore?

“And think about the foreign policy issues that the financial crises will cause. Just think in terms that when U.S. prosperity declines, it takes the world down with it. The economic contraction is going to set some societies back by decades. Will people take that lying down? Or will they riot in the streets and burn down the capitol building? Expect a rash of failed states. We’ll be surprised at some of the names that fall off the map. Wow, we might look back and wish for the days when the world hated us just because we invaded Iraq. Now they’ll blame us for stealing their future.”

“The Republicans will make political hay out of it. Unless they are totally incompetent, which you can’t rule out. Democrats will probably lose seats in the House and Senate in the 2010 elections, as well as in state legislatures and governorships. But Obama will be working his own game of building consensus. He’s from a new generation of politician. He’s not nearly as in-your-face confrontational as the Democrats of the 1960s and 1970s era, the Kennedys and Waxmans and Barney Franks. Obama will build coalitions out of whomever he can get on board. You might not like him on issues like gun control or abortion, but you’ll deal with him on tax cuts and energy investment.”

Where Do You Go From Here?

So where do we go from here? Well, here’s my post-Inaugural advice. Build up some cash reserves. Got that? Hold Cash! Cash in the mattress. Cash in the bank. Certificates of deposit. Don’t try to get too fancy. Just save some cash where you can get hold of it in case you need it pronto.

Next, buy precious metals like gold and silver. Bullion coins or bars are my favorites. But it never hurts to buy a few quality numismatic coins as well. Don’t get spooked out of precious metals if we see a price dip in the near to medium term. The dollar is in serious trouble, and eventually the precious metals will come back. Precious metals are a way of preserving your purchasing power over the long term.

As for stocks, in the near future, we could see some severe market declines. Initially, this might look like large trading spikes up and down. Unless you are a serious trader, be careful about trying to “play” the swings. Don’t be afraid to sell any stock that makes you nervous. You have to be able to sleep at night. Along these lines, I’ll keep addressing the OI portfolio in future updates.

There are certain investment ideas that will probably work over the long term, like really good precious metals miners. Kinross Gold (KGC: NYSE) and Goldcorp (GG: NYSE) come to mind. The point is that you want well-capitalized miners with solid reserves and good production facilities.

That’s all for now.

Regards,
Byron W. King

January 28, 2009

Inside The Obama Huddle: Housing, Banking, Life and Crisis was originally featured on Whiskey and Gunpowder. Visit Laissez Faire Books for the best selection of libertarian book titles.

According to Mark Hulbert at CBS Marketwatch, 1958 was the last time the yield on the S&P 500 exceeded the yield on the 30-year bond. 1958? Are you kidding? Elvis joined the U.S. Army in 1958. Eisenhower was in the White House, Khrushchev in the Kremlin, and Menzies was elected for the fifth time in Australia.

The world may have lived on the edge of nuclear holocaust in 1958, but at least some things were more certain. You were better dead than Red. What was good for GM was good for America. And everyone liked Ike.

The world is much more confusing today. The yield on S&P stocks was 2% this time last year, a 74% increase in the last twelve months. We reckon stocks will start to look even more appealing when the yield reaches 5% or 6%, which would also mean lower stock prices first.

But there’s a bigger story going on, too. It’s what we call the Fed’s war on cash. You see, the Fed is driving down yields on government bonds and notes of all maturities quite deliberately. More on what it’s up to below. But it’s not just the Fed that’s pulling out all the monetary stops to float the world on a sea of credit.

It’s a now a race to the bottom for central bank interest rates. New Zealand’s central bank cut its main interest rates by a whopping 1.5% overnight. But the Kiwis have some work to do. Short-term rates across the Tasman are still at 5%, 450 basis points above Ben Bernanke’s Fed.

You don’t normally see such aggressive rate cutting in an economy until unemployment levels are much higher. It’s the classic Keynesian trade-off between inflation and unemployment. You can keep prices stable by keeping the rate growth low and savings high.

But slow, steady, prudent growth doesn’t create jobs fast enough for politicians. So rates are lowered! This leads to lower unemployment rates, but higher inflation. The big change in the last thirty years is that higher inflation was tolerable for most workers in the Western world because it seemed to come with some juicy benefits.

The first was asset price inflation. Houses and stocks went up too! Real wage growth was flat (or even fell). But the value of things you bought went up! On paper, everyone got wealthier.

Then, when China came along and started churning out geegaws and widgets faster than you could slap down a credit card, the apparent virtues of a little bit of inflation seemed limitless. Stocks and house prices went up, but consumer goods, durables, and electronics got cheaper.

This so-called “Great Moderation” suckered people into a dangerous financial strategy: asset-based saving and debt accumulation. And why not?

In a way, it’s perfectly rational. If credit is cheap and asset prices are rising, why not borrow to buy stocks and houses? The debt service is low, employment was pretty easy to find, and capital appreciation in your assets would smooth out any rough edges to the strategy.

Well, now that strategy is coming unhinged. In fact, the larger implication is so scary that only people like Robert Shiller dare to mention it: asset price appreciation is not a retirement strategy. It was a good run, from 1982 to 2000. But the idea that the stock market is society’s way of managing the risk of old age is now showing its own age. Investors are skittish.

“Fortress Investment Group LLC fell 25 percent to a record low,” reports Bloomberg, “after the private-equity and hedge-fund manager halted redemptions from its Drawbridge Global Macro fund, which had lost value this year.” Investors are seeking redemptions of over $3.5 billion from Fortress.

The run on the hedge funds is only restrained by the lock-up periods most investors agree to when turning their money over to a fund manager. But time takes care of that. Investors will continue asking for their cash back if they believe the market is either too risky or too mediocre.

This move to cash must distress the Fed and other central banks. It wants banks to lend, businesses to spend, and consumers to borrow. But the exact opposite is happening. So now we see the Fed doing its best to punish those in cash and force them to spend, or at least get out of government bonds and buy stocks.

Banks are content for now to build up a war chest of excess reserves. In fact, there’s been a surge in excess reserves held at the Fed by banks, and not just since the crisis began last October (the same is true of cash held at the RBA by authorised deposit taking institutions, see column K).

In other words, banks are happy to borrow from the Fed, but sad to lend to anyone. So what do they do? They deposit their new borrowings right back with the Fed, where they earn 1.5% interest (in excess of the target Fed Funds rate).

According to Fed data, U.S. financial institutions had just $60 billion in excess reserves held at the Fed at the end of September. On October 5th, the TARPenstein was passed. By the end of October, excess reserves held at the Fed had grown to $267 billion. By the end of November, it was $610 billion. Don’t fight the Fed! Flee to it!

Even a Congressman should be able to figure out what’s going on here. Correlation is not causation. But it sure looks like a lot of TARP money has gone straight to banks and financials, who’ve then put the money hard at work…on the Fed balance sheet, where it’s safe, secure, and earning 1.5%.

Maybe that was the whole point of TARP anyway. To beef up bank capital positions and not increase lending and spending. But the Fed is busy elsewhere in the bond market trying to get investors out of cash into something (anything!) else.

In a march that would have made General Sherman glow with joy, the Fed is systematically decimating the yield on U.S. government bonds and notes. It is blitzkrieging its way through the U.S. yield curve, buying, or threatening to buy U.S. bonds and notes in order to lower rates.

Don’t believe it? Bloomberg reports that the yield on 90-day Treasuries is .01%, while Ten-year U.S. notes yield 2.66%. Both yields, as you can see on the chart below from the Dallas Fed, are down.

By buying up securities with different maturities the Fed lowers interest rates. Investors crowd in looking for safety and, of course, rising prices. But what is the Fed really up to? Is it really trying to reduce American savers and those on fixed incomes to a state of pauper hood, where a lifetime of savings is consumed in a firestorm of inflation?

That is no way to treat your grandparents. So let’s give the Fed the benefit of the doubt and say that the ultimate objective of the policy is to drive interest rates on government bonds so low that savers and more importantly, banks, begin to loan out some of their excess reserves, or better yet, use them to buy distressed assets from each other.

If you want to use a military metaphor, the Fed is dropping big rocks on safe houses from its EZ Money helicopter battleship. One basis point at a time, it is methodically destroying any rational reason for investment advisors to put their clients in Treasuries.

And so if you’re not going to be in ultra-safe Treasuries because they are really no better than cash, then what will you do with your money? You have to do something with it. You will spend it. Or invest it.

Either way, you will get rid of it. There is no value in holding it, at least rationally. Emotionally, it feels safe, which is why ten-year yields are back at Eisenhower levels.

The risk here is that once everyone is crowded into the Treasury market, everyone gets too scared to leave. Safety in numbers, etc. On the one hand, it puts a lot of concentrated capital at risk in a great inflation. On the other, it sets up U.S. interest rates up for a massive spike if investors fear an inflationary spike and flee U.S. bonds to stocks or commodities. Talk about an interest rate shock.

Any way you look at it, the plunge in ten-year yields is impressive by historic standards. What you’re seeing is major dysfunction in capital markets. Capital is fleeing entrepreneurial risk for government bonds. Pressure is building. Something is going to give.

Regards,
Dan Denning
www.dailyreckoning.com.au

The Fed’s War on Cash was originally featured on Whiskey and Gunpowder. Visit Laissez Faire Books for the best selection of libertarian book titles.

Inertia weighs on an investor, trapping him in a state of paralysis and freezing his portfolio, almost forcing him to hold on to whatever he already owns – for no better reason than that he already owns it. He hopes that every one of his old shoes will go up, even if the reason for the purchase is long forgotten or the environment in which the investment might have prospered has vanished. People who substitute hope for cold-blooded analysis almost inevitably wind up losing money.

So, for the sake of argument, let’s look at where you might best put your money for the rest of the year 2007. To keep things simple, let’s assume you start by liquidating all the cats and dogs populating your portfolio, so that you have just a pile of cash. No, let’s not phrase it that way… because then you’re going to start wondering which of the securities you own really are cats and dogs. You might get bogged down. And then inertia will creep back in, and you’ll throw your hands up and do nothing. So let’s assume you sell everything, in true going-out-of-business style.

Now, what’s the smartest place to put that money? Let’s look at the alternatives.

Bonds? A disastrous sucker bet. Bonds, at the moment, are a triple threat to your capital. First, you have a huge risk with interest rates, which are still near historic lows; as they go up, the market value of your bonds drops proportionately. Second, no matter which of the fiat currencies you choose, you have a big currency risk; while the US dollar is on the fast train to zero, virtually every other currency in the world is being inflated along with it and is heading toward eventual oblivion. Third, you have credit risk; General Motors isn’t the only large company whose bonds may go into default.

Stocks? The general market is yielding less than 2% in dividends, less than 1/3 of what you typically see at major market bottoms. And selling for more than 18 times earnings—more than 25% higher than its norm. Worse, for those who might be buyers, the bull market of the century started in 1982 and, in inflation-adjusted terms, ended in 2000. You might not want to hear it, but stocks are almost certainly early into a bear market that could last another 5 or 10 years. By all traditional measures, chances are much better that stocks will drop 50% from here than gain 50%.

Cash? You could always just stay in T-bills. But they currently yield only 5%, before taxes. And inflation (notwithstanding the highly imaginary official figures) is probably running around 6% and likely to head higher.

Real Estate? At the present, at least in the U.S., this is probably the worst choice of all. The speculative boom crested last year, and the market, burdened by an immense amount of debt and overleveraged speculation, is likely to head down for years to come. Of course, there are places in the world, two of our favorites being Argentina and Uruguay, where there isn’t much of a mortgage market, so the properties aren’t overleveraged and values are still available. But unless you are looking to pick up cheap land in undeveloped, exotic countries that have avoided the credit-driven bubble, real estate should be last on your list of investments.

Mutual funds? Any mutual fund you’re likely to pick is just a way of buying one of the investments we’ve already dismissed. And paying all those fees and expenses that come with a mutual fund just makes the bet that much worse.

So What Should You Do?

Since 2001, we’ve been in a natural resources bull market. If you were one of the few who positioned yourself in gold, silver or pretty much any of the metals or energy commodities – either directly or through the shares in smaller resource companies, which is the preferred vehicle we have been recommending to subscribers of our International Speculator — you’ve already made the easy money.

At least to us, before the bull market kicked off, the opportunity in the sector seemed obvious, with many resource companies selling for less than the cash they had in the bank. Few people even knew the sector existed, and most of them thought it was a dead duck after the 20-year-long bear market it had suffered since 1980.

The easy-money stage of the resource bull ended in 2003, at which time we entered the second stage, where the market climbs a “wall of worry.” In even the most formidable of bull markets, this phase comes with inevitable corrections and scary downdrafts. Per its moniker, with each short-term setback in price, investors who were shrewd enough to get positioned early on into the long bull market fret that they might be wrong. Some are shaken out, but the smart ones buy even more on the dips.

But now, in my opinion, we are about to enter the third, and most important, stage of the classic bull market: the mania stage. This will resemble the tail-end of the Internet stock bull market. It’s hard to predict exactly what catalyst will set it off, but it will very likely be rising expectations for inflation. Fear will drive the foreigners who hold about $6 trillion to sell the greenback, and they’ll be joined by savvy Americans. Some will buy other paper currencies, like the euro or the yen. But those units are just backed by U.S. dollars themselves, so they really aren’t much in the way of an escape pod. Inevitably, much of the money now sloshing through the world will try to get into gold. While no one can say with certainty, I expect the metal to hit $1,000 within the next 12 months and go much, much higher by the end of the decade.

Is this an unreasonable prediction? No.

Most casual investors mistakenly look at gold and think it’s been a leader in this bull market when, in actual fact, it’s a laggard compared to the industrial metals that have been bidden up to extraordinary highs by soaring demand from China, India and other emerging markets.

To give you just a few examples, in the last five years, copper has been up 330%, nickel 560%, uranium 1,150%, zinc up 460%, molybdenum up 450%, and even lowly lead, the most basic of base metals, is up 425%. By comparison, gold is up only 100%.

That will change, however, because although gold has many and growing industrial uses, it’s main use is as money. It will dawn on the herd that the world is drowning in a flood of increasingly worthless paper currency, and they’re going to stampede toward the high ground of gold.

The metal isn’t just going through the roof. It’s going to the moon.

Gold Good, Gold Shares Better

When gold really starts to move, the mining exploration stocks are going to howl. That’s because gold exploration stocks are not just highly leveraged plays on the price of gold. They are capable of providing you with triple-digit gains based on exploration success alone.

Case in point, the last mining share boom from 1993-96, which occurred at the tail-end of gold’s 20-year bear market and carried hundreds of stocks with it, was driven entirely by a handful of discoveries. Since gold prices turned up, starting in 2001, a lot of money has been spent on exploration, and that work will inevitably lead to major discoveries and market excitement. Several of the companies we follow in our International Speculator are already drilling into what look to be monster deposits. Confirmation of a major discovery could well ignite a mania in the market.

While most other investments, such as bonds, industrial stocks, real estate and broad mutual funds are likely to be serious losers over the coming years, the bull market in gold and gold exploration stocks has still barely entered the public’s consciousness. Although the easy money has been made, the big money is waiting to be picked up.

Nothing in the investing world is ever a sure thing, but today the exploration stocks look to be as close as it gets. As for the inevitable corrections during this “wall of worry” phase, remember that the time to be timid is when everyone else is bold, and the time to be bold is when everyone else is timid. Sell-offs in the gold and gold mining sector are, to our way of thinking, gift-wrapped opportunities to buy.

Regards,
Doug Casey
June 15, 2007

Your Cash is Trash, and So Are Most of Your Investments was originally featured on Whiskey and Gunpowder. Visit Laissez Faire Books for the best selection of libertarian book titles.