I have thought for some time that things could get dangerously out of hand in America, despite our exceptionalist notion that we are immune to the common plot-lines of history. For starters, inauguration night will seem more like Halloween, as those two little words fly in to haunt the new president. So, a large and looming question is: Who will be appointed the next attorney general of the U.S. (to replace the human sash-weight currently occupying the office), and how soon will the federal marshals be scouring the wainscoted hallways of Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase, not to mention a thousand Greenwich, Connecticut, hedge fund boiler rooms, with man-sized nets?

A storyline is already emerging to the effect that these birds really didn’t quite know what they were doing in grinding out that multi-trillion dollar basket of alphabet securities sausage (a theme on Sunday’s 60 Minutes broadcast). Nobody will buy that line of BS, though — and certainly not in the courtroom where, for instance, Mr. Hank Paulson will have to answer why his own firm of Goldman Sachs set up a special unit to short its own issues. It will be edifying to see how they answer.

In the meantime, however, millions of Joe-the-Plumber types will have gotten their pink slips, slipped helplessly into foreclosure, watched the repo men hot-wire their Ford pickups, and eaten down the kitchen cupboard to a single box of Kellogg’s All-Bran (which had been sitting there for eleven years infested with weevils). They will be watching the official proceedings in the federal courtrooms with jaundiced eyes as they hunch in their tent cities, in the rain, sipping amateur-brand raisin wine bartered for a few snared rock doves. How long before the hardier ones among them venture out to Easthampton with long knives and matches?

It will bring little satisfaction though, and the disappointment could lead to a more inchoate outbreak of civil disorder that would be more like a free-for-all of vengeance and grievance. There will be a great outcry for the new government to “do something!” Perhaps that will finally bring the troops home from Iraq — only for them to find that the Homeland has become Iraq….

If the financial system completes its self-destruction — and that’s looking more and more like a real possibility — there will be several pretty awful consequences. One is that the United States will be forced to declare bankruptcy by repudiating its own debt. All those who took refuge in U.S. Treasury bonds and bills will be like folks who sought shelter from a tornado in their out-house. That would go hand-in-hand with a massive currency inflation that is likely to follow the current phase of compressive liquidating deflation — in which every possible asset is being sold off for less than its face value. That process is self-limiting due to the finite supply of real salable assets. The trillions of dollars injected into the system while this is happening must eventually snap-back as people shed the last fungible article and compete for necessary commodities like food and fuel with dollars that are suddenly plentiful but worthless. At some point, the government may have to summon up a new currency. I don’t think it will be anything like the “Amero” which the paranoid fringe incessantly mutters about as part of their fantasy in which the U.S., Mexico, and Canada all join up to become one country. But any “new dollar” would probably have to be backed by gold.

As we discover ourselves to be a much poorer nation, one of my correspondents put it: “the bogus risk-swapping economy must be replaced by a net value-added economy.” That means actually making things, growing things, and rebuilding things, and that can only begin to happen if we do not stupidly sucker ourselves into a war with other nations who are liable to be extremely ticked off at us for destroying the global economy, but also competing with us for a dwindling supply of resources that are not equitably distributed around the world.

This means especially oil. I hope you’re enjoying the temporarily cheap prices at the gas pumps, because this is purely a function of the compressive deleveraging that is going on right now, as contracts and positions held in energy markets are being dumped by everybody and his uncle to raise cash to meet margin calls. My guess is that oil and its byproducts will become much more difficult to get in the months ahead — not just more expensive, but literally not available. The current falling price of oil has little to do with the real supply and demand fundamentals. It’s simply a function of the markets being in near-total disarray. We’re running on current inventory, and running it down. In the background, all kinds of peculiar and terrible things are happening. The entire apparatus of allocation and distribution is being thrown out of whack. The smaller tanker operations are going bankrupt. The “less-developed” nations are heading back to the 17th-century level of daily life without electricity. The oil exploration and development projects that were planned for hard-to-get oil netting $100-a-barrel minimum — in places like the deepwater Gulf of Mexico, Siberia, and Central Asia — are being shelved, which means the world has less of a chance to offset coming depletions in old fields.

The bottom line of all this is that we in the U.S. could find ourselves in a situation of shortages, hoarding, and rationing. This would pretty much kill off whatever remains of the previous shuck-and-jive economy — hamburger sales, theme park visits, NASCAR weekends — while it makes obvious the failures of our suburban living arrangements (and drives the value of housing there closer to zero). My pet project of restoring the American passenger railroad system might seem pretty minor in the face of all this, but it’s at least a place to start that will accomplish several things: allow people and things to get places without cars and trucks; put many thousands of people to work at many levels doing something of direct, practical value; and be a small step in rebuilding confidence that we are a society capable of accomplishing something.

Regards,

Jim Kunstler
October 30, 2008

Easthampton Burning? was originally featured on Whiskey and Gunpowder. Visit Laissez Faire Books for the best selection of libertarian book titles.

Oil is the energy life-blood of all modern economies. So when a nation debauches its currency, the oil markets react instantly. And oil will not accept monetary malpractice, certainly not by the U.S. Federal Reserve. If traders perceive that the dollar is declining, this perception lights the fuse for oil prices to rise.

There is an old saying that “You can’t fight the Fed.” But oil is fighting the Fed. In fact, oil is scoring a knockout, like Muhammad Ali over Sonny Liston. Oil is floating like a butterfly and stinging like a bee — landing body blows and pinning the Fed against the ropes.

The Fed can no longer cheat with the money supply and get away with it. There is a new gold standard and it’s called “oil.” This may not be a monetary “fact” that central bankers would acknowledge publicly. But it is a monetary fact of life out in the trading pits.

Even the President himself is powerless to alter this new fact of life. He cannot simply fortify the dollar’s supremacy by seizing the world’s oil at $20.67 a barrel, like Franklin Roosevelt seized America’s privately held gold for $20.67 an ounce in 1933. And even if the President could confiscate the world’s oil at below-market prices, he might not understand how such a confiscation would influence the dollar’s value.

The “oil connection” to monetary policy is a new and poorly understood development. It’s not what people expect. It’s not how we all grew up. It sure did not used to be this way.

For the past 149 years, it has been a fairly safe bet that the world’s oil supply would grow. The only truly difficult period for oil was between 1979 and 1981, when the Iranian oil industry collapsed in the wake of revolution. The world supply-chain lost nearly five million barrels per day of output. And that loss helped produce the worst recession in the U.S. since the 1930s.

But even back in the early 1980s, new oil sources were coming online. Everybody could see it. The fields of Alaska, the North Sea, Mexico, Angola and other places were just kicking into gear. So the price of oil could not go “too high” because there was a clear indication in the marketplace that there would be more oil coming down the pipes.

And that’s exactly what happened. By the mid-1980s, oil was selling for less than $15 per barrel. Cheap energy made a lot of things look easy, from growing the economy to winning the Cold War.

There was a dark side to cheap oil, however. It produced and nurtured the illusion that oil would be cheap forever…or at least for a very long time. But looking ahead from today, it is crystal clear that it will be more difficult to grow the worldwide oil supply than in the past. We may be at Peak Oil right now, but we won’t know that for a while.

Oil-producing areas like Alaska, the North Sea and Mexico, are in decline. Meanwhile, as worldwide oil demand grows quickly, oil output is at a measurable plateau. There is almost no “spare” capacity anywhere outside of Saudi Arabia, and the Saudi margin is smaller than most people think. At the same time, net oil exports are decreasing from most oil-producing nations. Internal demand is rising in almost all oil-producing states. So there is simply less oil to go around. And unlike in the early 1980s, there’s no relief in sight.

Oil supplies are severely constrained. Dollar supplies aren’t. Perhaps these related facts are what inspired Alexey Miller, the CEO of Russia’s oil giant, Gazprom to predict that oil would rise to $250 a barrel in “the foreseeable future.” The Fed can “talk” a strong dollar all it wants, but as long as the supply of dollars and dollar-denominated credit continues to grow, the oil price will continue to climb.

In the era of Bretton Woods, the global monetary system followed the golden rule: “He who has the gold makes the rules.” But today, the “rule of crude” dominates. Thus we are left to ask, what is the meaning of crude oil at $137? It means that the reign of the dollar is coming to a close. The dollar has reached the end of its post-Second World War period of dominance as the world’s reserve currency.

That’s why today’s oil buyers, like the late French President Charles de Gaulle, are so eager to exchange their dollars for a tangible asset. De Gaulle shipped France’s dollar reserves across the Atlantic in exchange for gold bars from the vaults of Fort Knox. Today oil traders are shipping their excess dollars to the New York Mercantile Exchange in exchange for barrels of oil. The motives are identical. Only the underlying monetary asset has changed.

So what of the U.S. dollar? Well, a man named Lazarus once rose from his deathbed. But Lazarus had some help. Could the dollar be as fortunate as Lazarus? These words come to mind, from the Book of Luke at 17:37: “Wheresoever the body is, thither will the eagles be gathered together.”

Until we meet again…
Byron W. King
June 16, 2008

P.S.: The economic principles behind what you’ve just read are really quite simple. Oil is gaining in value while the dollar is losing, and it all comes down to one word: scarcity. Oil is becoming scarce while the dollar is increasingly more abundant. Savvy investors realize this when investing in commodity markets, especially the energy sector. And that’s the main focus behind my investment research service, Energy & Scarcity Investor.

Peak Oil and Inflation was originally featured on Whiskey and Gunpowder. Visit Laissez Faire Books for the best selection of libertarian book titles.