<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Whiskey and Gunpowder &#187; mileage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whiskeyandgunpowder.com/tag/mileage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whiskeyandgunpowder.com</link>
	<description>Whiskey and Gunpowder features articles on gold, oil, currencies, emerging markets, energy, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 19:54:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Case of the Missing High-Mileage Car</title>
		<link>http://whiskeyandgunpowder.com/the-case-of-the-missing-high-mileage-car/</link>
		<comments>http://whiskeyandgunpowder.com/the-case-of-the-missing-high-mileage-car/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 21:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Tucker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flying car]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mileage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Passat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volkswagen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whiskeyandgunpowder.com/?p=9794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How would you like to drive from New York to Los Angeles with just one stop for gas? It seems incredible and wonderful, but it can happen. In late 2010, the Volkswagen Passat BlueMotion set a new world record for the &#8220;longest distance traveled by a standard production passenger car on a single tank of [...]<p><a href="http://whiskeyandgunpowder.com/the-case-of-the-missing-high-mileage-car/">The Case of the Missing High-Mileage Car</a> was originally featured on <a href="http://whiskeyandgunpowder.com">Whiskey and Gunpowder</a>. Visit <a href="http://lfb.org/">Laissez Faire Books</a> for the best selection of libertarian book titles.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would you like to drive from New York to Los Angeles with just one stop for gas? It seems incredible and wonderful, but it can happen. In late 2010, the Volkswagen Passat BlueMotion set a new world record for the &#8220;longest distance traveled by a standard production passenger car on a single tank of gas.&#8221; It travels 1,526.63 miles. It translates to a fuel economy of 75 miles per gallon.</p>
<p>Sweet! Only one thing &#8212; this passenger car is for the U.K. You can&#8217;t drive this car in the United States. We have a Passat, but it gets nowhere near this excellent mileage. Even stranger, many of the engines in these, which are driven all over Europe, are actually built in the U.S. The trouble is that it can&#8217;t jump through the regulatory hoops in the land of the free.</p>
<p>This fact was first brought to my attention by a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBnlXGvA1Wk&amp;feature=youtube_gdata_player" target="_blank">video blogger</a> who had been driving a van version of this amazing car in the U.K. He came home to ask his Volkswagen dealer about it. The dealer quickly informed him that this model is not allowed on U.S. roads. The Passat in Europe runs on a 54.1-fluid ounce common-rail four-cylinder engine. The standard in the U.S. is a 67.6-fluid ounce engine. For this reason and a few others, the version you can drive here gets 45 miles per gallon.</p>
<p>The blogger was furious as he reported this, and he further explained the absurdity. It seems that the emissions regulations are calculated based on a per gallon basis. The U.K. Passat does not pass because its emissions pollutants are slightly over regulation.</p>
<p>The blogger further pointed out the silliness: The car goes much farther than the American version on a single gallon, resulting in less overall pollutants. But that doesn&#8217;t matter, given the manner in which fuel-efficiency happens to be calculated. In the U.S., a car with low emissions could get 1 mile per gallon and pass, but one with slightly higher emissions couldn&#8217;t get through, even if it went 100 miles on a gallon.</p>
<p>Infuriating, yes. But because the video was widely circulated, the revisionists started getting to work to debunk the claim. <a href="http://pesn.com/2012/05/01/9602085_VW_not_allowed_by_US_government_to_sell_high_mileage_cars_to_US_consumers/" target="_blank">One</a> blogger called Volkswagen. The spokesman made several salient points. A gallon in the U.K. is actually slightly larger than in the U.S., thereby reducing the mileage disparity between the U.K. and U.S. models. Further, these 54.1 engines are actually not that popular in the U.S. market because Americans don&#8217;t really care that much about mileage. Finally, mileage is actually calculated differently in the U.K., so the cars aren&#8217;t quite comparable in this sense.</p>
<p>Now, that&#8217;s all very interesting, and provides an interesting corrective, but it begs the critical question: Can this record-breaking, high-mileage car be sold in the U.S.? It would appear that the claim of the original video blogger stands: It cannot. You might want this car. VW might want to sell it. Europeans love it. But we, as Americans, are not permitted to buy it, and VW is not permitted to sell it. Regardless of the details, these are facts. The VW spokesman was really just talking around the point, as all corporations do when they are confronted with the awfulness of regulations.</p>
<p>The original blogger suggested conspiracy. But then, there is Hanlon&#8217;s razor: Never attribute to conspiracy what can easily be explained by stupidity. Regulations are inherently stupid because they presume the perpetuation of an existing technology and production model. They can never account for change or improvement.</p>
<p>No matter how you write them, no matter how smart you are, there will come a time when the intended results of all regulations will reverse themselves. They will inhibit, rather than advance, progress. They will degrade, rather than improve, products. They will block, rather than inspire, technological improvement. This is an unavoidable fate, no matter how smart the regulators are.</p>
<p>In a private market, rules and standards adapt to change. This is because private parties get that the point of a rule or standard isn&#8217;t the rule or standard but the results. The point is to achieve results. If the exact reverse of the point is observed, the rule is changed over time. In this way, private markets are flexible in ways that government regulations can never be.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s raise a point about another incredible and wonderful thing: the flying car. It appears that the Terrafugia &#8220;roadable aircraft&#8221; is finally going into production and might be available for purchase sometime next year. It has recently been subjected to vast media attention, and that&#8217;s all to the good.</p>
<p>Now, one might suppose that the journalism on this car would focus on what an amazing thing this really is, how it takes us a step toward the Jetsons&#8217; world, how it might make a contribution to unclogging highways and so on.<a href="http://lfb.org/shop/economics/its-a-jetsons-world-private-miracles-and-public-crimes-copy/?lfb_coupon=E401N506" target="_blank"><img class="alignright" style="border-style: initial;border-color: initial;border-width: 0px" src="http://www.ezimages.net/WHISKEY/050712_book1.png" alt="" width="129" height="195" align="right" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>But no, that&#8217;s not what the stories have been about. It seems that the major &#8220;work&#8221; that has gone into the engineering behind this flying car has nothing to do with making it amazing for you and me. It is all about the endless government regulations that have stood in its way. The bureaucrats, not the consumers, rule the day.</p>
<p>Imagine: It&#8217;s hard enough to build a car that complies with regulatory bureaus. It&#8217;s hard enough to build an airplane that complies with the mandates of regulatory bureaus. It appears to be darn near impossible to make something that complies with both! It has to pass emissions tests, crash tests, navigation tests, design tests, mileage tests and a million other tests. Then there&#8217;s the problem of licenses for the drivers and fliers and the compliance with airport and road regulations. What a nightmare! It seems that the bulk of the energy of the company has been spent on this.</p>
<p>The actual reality of the flying car has been around since the 1930s. It keeps being revived again and again. What&#8217;s making it flounder? The problem is that this innovation is neither fish nor fowl from the point of view of government bureaucrats. Therefore, they don&#8217;t know what to do with it.</p>
<p>The results are, quite frankly, rather disappointing. The Terrafugia is a small plane with foldable wings so that you can drive it around. That&#8217;s it. There will be no levitating out of traffic. There will be no landing in your driveway. You have to drive it like a car to the airport, and then take off, fly, land and drive home again. That&#8217;s kind of cool, yet it raises the question: Why not just park your car and hop in your airplane?</p>
<p><strong>You have to have a wild imagination to see the world that would exist were it not for government controls.</strong> These controls wreck innovation. They deny us access to seeming utopias. They kill the entrepreneurial spirit and set society back. They thwart progress and forbid us from working toward a future that is better than the past.</p>
<p>We will never know what we are missing so long as we continue to allow government to throw the whole of society into a regulatory thicket. Life is pretty amazing, true, but it could be far more so. Instead, we suffer in ways we don&#8217;t know. This is the big, horrible picture.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Jeffrey Tucker</p>
<p><a href="http://whiskeyandgunpowder.com/the-case-of-the-missing-high-mileage-car/">The Case of the Missing High-Mileage Car</a> was originally featured on <a href="http://whiskeyandgunpowder.com">Whiskey and Gunpowder</a>. Visit <a href="http://lfb.org/">Laissez Faire Books</a> for the best selection of libertarian book titles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whiskeyandgunpowder.com/the-case-of-the-missing-high-mileage-car/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Should the Car of the Future Be?</title>
		<link>http://whiskeyandgunpowder.com/what-should-the-car-of-the-future-be/</link>
		<comments>http://whiskeyandgunpowder.com/what-should-the-car-of-the-future-be/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linda Brady Traynham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Whiskey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mileage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whiskeyandgunpowder.com/?p=4568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More and more life under Big Brother&#8217;s vengeful eye is joyless, drab, dreary, and filled with guilt.  It is time to rebel&#8211;at least automotively. Instead of straining for the unrealistic and unsafe at enormous prices, why don&#8217;t we just drive the great automotive achievements of the past?  Instead of spending a great deal on an [...]<p><a href="http://whiskeyandgunpowder.com/what-should-the-car-of-the-future-be/">What Should the Car of the Future Be?</a> was originally featured on <a href="http://whiskeyandgunpowder.com">Whiskey and Gunpowder</a>. Visit <a href="http://lfb.org/">Laissez Faire Books</a> for the best selection of libertarian book titles.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More and more life under Big Brother&#8217;s vengeful eye is joyless, drab, dreary, and filled with guilt.  It is time to rebel&#8211;at least automotively.</p>
<p>Instead of straining for the unrealistic and unsafe at enormous prices, why don&#8217;t we just drive the great automotive achievements of the past?  Instead of spending a great deal on an unsatisfactory new car with higher gas mileage, let&#8217;s save twenty or thirty thousand (or more!) by buying a superb used car that offers everything we want.  Truly great automobiles never go out of style and they last for decades.  We&#8217;re not talking about a &#8217;91 Plymouth, here!  I want to see you in BMW, Mercedes, and Jaguar.</p>
<p>I posit that the cars of your future should be whatever you, personally, prefer in vehicles, and that the time to buy is now.  Prices are down all across the board and there are many fine old cars for sale ludicrously inexpensively.  Unless you, too, are brainwashed with dread over &#8220;carbon footprints,&#8221; get whatever older model has all of the features you want that gets your idea of adequate gas mileage.</p>
<p>A true luxury car isn&#8217;t even considered broken in well until about 113,000 miles.   Your dream car from bygone times will be good for at least a hundred thousand miles and you can drive happily in safety and comfort. Unlike union-built Detroit Iron, they&#8217;re built to last.  You don&#8217;t ever plan to trade them in.  You may want to buy more, mind, but you plan on loving and driving one for twenty or thirty years.  A check-up every fifteen thousand miles and a thorough going over every seventy-five thousand&#8211;yes, that&#8217;s &#8220;75,000&#8243;&#8211;and you aren&#8217;t likely to see the mechanic frequently.  &#8220;Fix it before it breaks&#8221; prevents further damage, and when a car is checked every fifteen thousand miles you aren&#8217;t likely to have unpleasant surprises.  Insurance on such cars is considerably less than on a new vehicle, particularly one without a real frame made out of metal so thin it will never protect you in a crash.</p>
<p>Your first purchase should be a Mercedes.  The right one will cost you between two and five thousand and it will be your road car (fast, powerful, comfortable) and your head-turning &#8220;night on the town&#8221; car.  It will always be a Mercedes, whereas a five-year-old Ford is an old car.  In particular, you want one that runs on diesel&#8211;that&#8217;s right, just like big trucks do, because diesel has 30% more octane than gasoline, has an almost indefinite shelf-life, requires a bigger engine (because it has higher compression, hence, more power), and that engine will come wrapped in genuine steel not metal you can crush like an empty Coke can.  As though that weren&#8217;t enough to fulfill just about everything on our wish list, one a quarter of a century old will still have at least a hundred and fifty thousand miles left in her (and that&#8217;s if you don&#8217;t find one with less than 150,000; Mr. Benz&#8217; cars have been known to go half a million.) and it won&#8217;t be full of quirky computerized electronics that go on the fritz frequently.  Imagine how smug you would feel with a few drums of diesel in your garage (if you don&#8217;t have room for a big tank) and were not inconvenienced by long lines, high prices, or ration coupons.</p>
<p>Your Mercedes will have a heavier engine (and body), be safer to handle, have a compression ratio in the range of 14-16 instead of 8.5, and use fuel that is less volatile (viz., likely to explode) while providing more energy.  And it will always be a Mercedes.  We had our choice of four beautifully-maintained big diesel Mercedes Benzes today between $3500 and $4500, not one of them needing a thing other than handing over cash and signing the title.</p>
<p>Life is too short to drink bad wine, eat plastic food, or drive undistinguished, underpowered little cars you peer at uncertainly in parking lots because you can&#8217;t tell yours from anyone else&#8217;s.   Could your wife like the idea of a luxury sedan with a Leaper on the hood?  I think so!  We Jag-u-ar aficionados wouldn&#8217;t dream of driving one of Mr. Ford&#8217;s cheap knock-offs.  The older our Cats are the better we like &#8216;em.  There are glorious older Jaguars to be found easily ranging from a couple of thousand to about ten.  Luxury European cars are almost always maintained scrupulously.  For well under the price of most used cars you could get a Six you put into tip-top condition and plan on her driving it happily forever, and several other elegant, reliable vehicles and a good supply of diesel for your Mercedes.</p>
<p>You want the most for your money and you want to solve the problem completely.  You need enough reliable cars to get your family where everyone needs to go, at rock bottom prices, with the peace that comes from knowing you can rely on them and love them so you aren&#8217;t going to get a &#8220;new car itch.&#8221; Somewhere out there are cars that will sing to you, cars that will be safe, efficient, comfortable, luxurious, and soul-satisfying, and there is no reason whatsoever to be badgered by what is available from Gov Mot.</p>
<p>Go find yourself something wonderful that reminds you of the joy you knew when you got your first car, one that fits you, that is sheer pleasure to drive, that gets you out of expensive loan payments, and that will keep you safe.  All new cars look alike, flimsy bread boxes and shoe boxes.  &#8220;Individuality&#8221; is fancy lights.  Find out, you younger ones, what it is like to drive a car that is distinctive, one you can find in a parking lot easily.  Find one that feels custom made, where your hands fall naturally on the controls and the seat cradles you just right.  Get an extremely tight steering ratio, superb braking, and plenty of get up and scat, and find out just how much fun it is to drive something you truly love and can afford.  So many of you who have never driven cars with individuality and zest.  All many of you have had is dull, expensive transportation.  Somewhere out there is a dream you can afford.  Go buy it, fix it up if it needs it, be happy, and we&#8217;ll give the Nanny State a real lesson in not messing with our passion.</p>
<p>Eventually a lot of people will be unable to run cars&#8211;but it doesn&#8217;t have to happen to us.  A big part of life is avoiding honestly and imaginatively restrictions we dislike.  I have no concern about the rest of the world when it comes to my beloved wheels and I imagine few of you do, either.</p>
<p>Keep America Beautiful.  Buy a car with a hood ornament!</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Linda Brady Traynham</p>
<p>June 19, 2009</p>
<p><strong>P.S.:</strong> Have I no social conscience?  No.  I have no interest in sacrificing myself on the altar of the putative public good.  Those who have no better choices can eat cake but I&#8217;m going to keep on driving what I like.</p>
<p>Have I not hung on James Howard Kunstler&#8217;s every word?  Yes.  Certainly I agree that much of JHK&#8217;s grim vision will come true, but I do not see why I should allow it to impinge upon my life.  I have no masochistic tendencies at all and I&#8217;ll go back to a horse and buggy before I will be stuffed into a wretchedly uncomfortable, seriously unsafe, ugly, bitty Greenie Mobile.  I have had marvelous cars for over fifty years and I intend to drive them so long as my eyesight and reflexes hold out or until the new Oliver Cromwell forces me to flee his fiefdom.  I&#8217;m a Cavalier, nothing will make me recant, and I expect a rousing &#8220;Huzzah!&#8221; from the rest of you who feel that way and are tired of Roundheads.</p>
<p><a href="http://whiskeyandgunpowder.com/what-should-the-car-of-the-future-be/">What Should the Car of the Future Be?</a> was originally featured on <a href="http://whiskeyandgunpowder.com">Whiskey and Gunpowder</a>. Visit <a href="http://lfb.org/">Laissez Faire Books</a> for the best selection of libertarian book titles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whiskeyandgunpowder.com/what-should-the-car-of-the-future-be/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taxing to Better Mileage?</title>
		<link>http://whiskeyandgunpowder.com/taxing-to-better-mileage/</link>
		<comments>http://whiskeyandgunpowder.com/taxing-to-better-mileage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Insley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mileage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whiskeyandgunpowder.com/?p=4542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There I was, surrounded by thousands of barrels of Kentucky’s finest &#8212; seemingly, enough bourbon to get every of-age taxpayer in the U.S. a little tipsy. By any stretch of the imagination, this place was paradise. Rolling hills as far as you could see and the air was thick with the smell of the latest [...]<p><a href="http://whiskeyandgunpowder.com/taxing-to-better-mileage/">Taxing to Better Mileage?</a> was originally featured on <a href="http://whiskeyandgunpowder.com">Whiskey and Gunpowder</a>. Visit <a href="http://lfb.org/">Laissez Faire Books</a> for the best selection of libertarian book titles.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There I was, surrounded by thousands of barrels of Kentucky’s finest &#8212; seemingly, enough bourbon to get every of-age taxpayer in the U.S. a little tipsy. By any stretch of the imagination, this place was paradise. Rolling hills as far as you could see and the air was thick with the smell of the latest batch. But even this paradise, hidden well in the confines of the Kentucky Bourbon Trail, was prey to Uncle Sam’s grubby little hands.</p>
<p>You see, on my recent trip to Kentucky’s Bourbon Trail, one thing stuck in my mind: TAXES. I was utterly shocked when I heard what the distillery tour guide was saying about a $13.50 per gallon tax on any distilled bourbon. That’s over $700 of taxes per barrel. And that’s before the bourbon even gets to the bottle. For me and you, fellow Whiskey Shooter, there’s another tax when we get to the counter—somewhere around 6%.</p>
<p>So what’s the total bourbon tax?</p>
<p>According to the Kentucky Distillers&#8217; Association, around 53% of the cost of the average-priced bottle goes to local, state, and government taxes.</p>
<p>I guess that’s why the tour guide took the time to tell us about the taxes. That way we wouldn’t be bitter when we paid $30 for a bottle of “corn juice.”</p>
<p>So the tour went on and our group wandered through the rest of the distillery &#8212; tasting the freshly distilled 160 proof grain alcohol, feeling the corn mash and playing in the gift shop&#8230;</p>
<p>But wait. Isn’t this taxation that same kind that created <a href="http://whiskeyandgunpowder.com/the-whiskey-rebellion-whiskey-taxes-the-real-thing/" target="_blank">rebellions</a>?</p>
<p>My tour group, and Americans in general, have been lulled to sleep, as if Uncle Sam slipped us a Mickey. Last I checked, the U.S. isn’t an alcohol supplier. Nor is it a real estate agent. Nor is it a car lot. But it seems like the current administration wants to get its hands on everything.</p>
<p>And the way things are going, who knows what’s next…</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong>The Latest Nickel-and-Dime “Tax”</strong></p>
<p>You gotta give it to ’em: At least Washington came up with an appropriate nickname for its latest cash grenade. It’s called <a href="http://www.gop.gov/bill/111/1/hr2751" target="_blank">“cash for clunkers,”</a> and last week the House approved the bill &#8212; with your money!</p>
<p>It simply amazes me that something this poorly thought up could pass so quickly through the largest legislative body in the U.S. Just think about it: 435 well-paid pairs of eyes took a look at this bill. And a majority OK’d it!</p>
<p>In case you haven’t heard of the latest clunker of a bill, let me give you the rundown…</p>
<p>It’s a $4 billion plan to subsidize sales of new cars with better mpg. Essentially, if you have a car that gets less than 18 miles per gallon and you “upgrade” to a new car that gets at least four more miles per gallon, you’re eligible for at least a $3,500 tax credit.</p>
<p>I love the well-accepted term “tax credit.” Does everyone on the Hill think we’re that easily swayed by bills that contain such positive-sounding phrasing?</p>
<p>Here at the Whiskey Bar, we aren’t that easily fooled. This “tax credit” is a simple euphemism for free money &#8212; money that you and I as U.S. taxpayers are providing. Simply put, it’s taking money from our pockets and giving it to new car buyers in an effort to jump-start new car sales.</p>
<p>I don’t know about you, but paying for my neighbor’s car wasn’t on my agenda today.</p>
<p>But let’s dig a little deeper, since we could be footing the bill…</p>
<p>The bill, as it stands, is less likely to be affecting normal car owners &#8212; so this is for our SUV/truck-driving neighbor. Because even if you bought a 1990 Chevy Cavalier or Ford Taurus, you’re still probably getting well above 18 mpg.</p>
<p>So obviously, this bill is almost strictly for those non-Peak Oil-thinking, overzealous SUV or truck buyers. These folks have roughly the same restraint and foresight as those who purchased houses that they couldn’t afford.</p>
<p>This bill is almost comical. But frankly, where does the spending stop on Capitol Hill? Combine this with the latest auto bailouts and it’s really starting to look like our nation has turned into a new and used car lot.</p>
<p>Things are getting scary ’round these parts.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong>Government Spends, You Save…</strong></p>
<p>Those dollars in your pocket aren’t looking as great as they once did. And as I see it, with an overburdened and overspending government, the dollar could be in for a crude awakening.</p>
<p>That’s because one thing is for sure: Over the next few years, the world is going to spin, the U.S. government is going to spend, and all of this will be running on the same fuel: oil.</p>
<p>As I wrote a few months back, <a href="http://whiskeyandgunpowder.com/higher-gas-prices-are-coming/" target="_blank">the price of gasoline is going to rise</a>. And that mainly stems from the rising price of crude oil.</p>
<p>As you know, the world’s commodities (most notably oil) are priced in U.S. dollars. As the dollar weakens, and as the Earth still spins and demands more energy, the price of oil is going to rise.</p>
<p>In my opinion, over the next three months to five years, oil is going to rocket &#8212; even more so than the price of gold. We got a taste of what can happen when oil spiked last year to $147 per barrel. And from my standpoint, it’s inevitably going to be back to those levels, or higher.</p>
<p>My best advice for protecting your hard-earned dollars over the next five years is simply to invest in all facets of the oil industry: oil service companies, oil holding companies, oil technology companies, and the commodity itself (through ETFs or commodity options).</p>
<p>Sure, the Obama administration wants to improve mpg, but one thing is for sure: We’re still going to be burning oil for decades to come &#8212; more and more every year. And although we may hit some rough patches for demand, the overall trend line is going to be UP.</p>
<p>By investing in oil, you’ll protect your wealth and profit at the same time.</p>
<p>After all, we all want to be able to afford our next bottle of bourbon.</p>
<p>Stay ahead of the curve,<br />
Matt Insley</p>
<p>June 17, 2009</p>
<p><a href="http://whiskeyandgunpowder.com/taxing-to-better-mileage/">Taxing to Better Mileage?</a> was originally featured on <a href="http://whiskeyandgunpowder.com">Whiskey and Gunpowder</a>. Visit <a href="http://lfb.org/">Laissez Faire Books</a> for the best selection of libertarian book titles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whiskeyandgunpowder.com/taxing-to-better-mileage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

