The Command Economy
Dec 23rd, 2009 | By Charles Goyette | Category: Featured, Macro Economics
America is transforming itself, without forethought, debate, or pause, into a command economy. A command economy is a top-down, state-controlled economy directed by planners and bureaucrats, boards and bodies, administrators and authorities. A command economy is not characterized by mutuality of interest and agreement between parties. It relies on edict. A command economy, as the name implies, orders the affairs of a nation by coercion. In a free economy goods and services are bought and sold by consent; business transactions are based on agreement; contracts depend upon a meeting of the minds of the parties involved. In a command economy government sets prices, controls and directs resources, and oversees production and consumption. Free economies produce prosperity; command economies produce poverty. The transformation of America is already taking place at breakneck speed, even before the current economic crisis is full blown. Historical precedents insist that as conditions worsen, the transformation into a command economy will accelerate.
It is astonishing that this should be taking place, especially at a time in which three billion people around the globe have rejected the poverty, want and shortages of their command economies to begin the experience and blessings of abundance. It is not as though object lessons are wanting. China’s stunning economic growth, its modernization and rising living standards are the result of nothing more complicated than freeing the command economy. Although lessons abound, Americans are choosing—or perhaps failing to choose and therefore letting the choice be made for them—to go in much the same direction as the command economy of postwar Great Britain. That period saw the nationalization of entire sectors of the British economy, a currency crisis and prolonged economic decline including crippling unemployment and choking inflation. The reasons that the United States would choose to follow a pattern that hollows out economies the way it did the British are many. But as a symptom, although not a cause of this self-inflicted harm, look to the modern American politician. For today’s breed of politician, power is their very passion. Their every concern and the entire public debate about politicians centers around the use of power. How may power best be exploited and aggrandized? Who is to be bailed out, who is to be plundered to pay for it? Who is to be subsidized, who penalized? Who shall be taxed and who shall be paid? In contrast, the founders looked upon power very differently: How can it be kept in check? In yielding to the former and to their command economy, the current generation of Americans, blessed with so much, will be the shame of the ages.
Anyone believing the evidence for the looming command economy is being overstated need look no further than the speed at which American finance has been nationalized in the current crisis. Legislators voted an initial $700 billion bailout package, but in no time the taxpayers ended up with more than eighteen times that, $12.8 trillion in loans, spending, and guarantees. And to make clear who is really in charge, the giveaways are accompanies by a refusal of the authorities to disclose who is getting what and what kind of collateral, if any, is being given. The trend was dramatically illustrated in October 2008. In a development that played out like a scene from The Godfather, the CEOs of the nine largest banks in America, dealmakers and negotiators in their right, were ushered into a room at the Treasury Department in Washington and handed a one-page document agreeing to sell preferred shares to the government. They were told by Henry Paulson, according to the New York Times account, that they must sign it before leaving. The chairman of Wells Fargo protested that his institution didn’t have problems with toxic mortgages and didn’t need a bailout. Too bad. “It was a take it or take it offer,” said one insider. An online writer for The Wall Street Journal favorably likened Paulson’s commandeering of the banks to Reagan at the Berlin Wall. “History often carries an air of inevitability,” he gushed.
If there is inevitability to America’s becoming a command economy, it is a sorrowful day for human freedom. The Central Plan of the command economy is incompatible with dissent, disagreement, individual preferences, and your own plan, whatever it may be. If the Central Plan is to prevent foreclosures on homeowners who can’t pay, then the plans of individuals whose resources will be used to prevent those foreclosures must give way. If your individual plan and the Central Plan are in conflict, you will have to give up your plan. As we have noted, a free economy rests on agreement, but a command economy is constructed of coercion. One of the reasons (among many to which I refer in my book The Dollar Meltdown) that a command economy produces poverty has to do with the diversion of productive human effort. In a free economy people provide services that are sought by others and they are rewarded for doing so. Each individual’s own wants and needs are met to the extent he finds ways to serve others. But in a command economy enormous amounts of human effort are expended in attempts to influence or control the Central Plan. This activity produces no new wealth. It only seeks to divide what wealth already exists.
The command economy is not the exclusive province of either the left or the right, Republican or Democrat, Communist or Fascist, Stalinist or Nazi, Pol Pot, Mao, Chávez, or Ahmadinejad. It is what they all have in common. Just as war is the health of the state, economic turbulence is the state’s opportunity for self-advancement. As the unseen and destructive consequences of each new command and initiative unfold, new plans are created and commands issued to undo the latest harm. In the current sequence, the Fed used its monetary monopoly to create artificial credit conditions; the cheap money fueled a housing boom, which, like all bubbles, popped; the monetary and fiscal authorities rushed in to bail out the banks; the only means they have of bailing out the banks is to borrow or print more money.
Regards,
Charles Goyette
December 23, 2009
ShareThis
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by ronsimon: The Command Economy: America is transforming itself, without forethought, debate, or pause, into a command economy…. http://bit.ly/6Og9Hj...
[...] Read more at Whiskey and Gunpowder. [...]
[...] The Command Economy [...]
One problem with a command economy is commanding others to produce. Many of them do not cooperate. Your essay reinforced my determination to become ever more self-sufficient and disengaged from ordinary commerce. “Use it up, wear it out, make it do, or do without.” Purchase used items privately for those carry no sales taxes and do not trigger new production, but they do reduce demand. Dispense with every possible “convenience” in the modern world that carries monthly taxes as well as fees. A different sort of scorched earth policy, where instead of destroying we refuse to consume. In a world where our overlords FORCE us to buy insurance against medical expenses, will they then compel us to purchase cell ‘phones and services? Why not? How can we be kept “safe” if we are not able to call for help every moment of our lives?
Linda, I am always amused at how much we think alike in so many ways. For instance I live quite comfortably on a $1000.00 per month. My friends and associates all think I am a bit daft for doing so. I really enjoy this, it is not much of a challenge really. Make do with what we have is the secret. My younger employees throw away good things quickly. For instance a pair of work gloves that have only been worn once and have a few smudges on them end up in the garbage can. Of course they do not have to pay for them either, I do. When found, I promptly dust them off and use them for myself, except how many pairs of gloves can a man use anyway? Is this the problem with our society today? Go get new ones, somebody else, the company or the gov’mint will take care of it. Anyway, Charles and you, and me also, do not have to play this game. Keep up with taking care of yourself, the guv’mint won’t be able to sometime in the future. Best Regards, CanadaNorth
[...] 27, 2009 · Leave a Comment From Whiskey and Gunpowder: The Command Economy Dec 23rd, 2009 | By Charles Goyette [...]
seems to me, even in a free market economy ,we are propagandized to at such a level that we ‘freely’ choose to buy exactly what “they” tell us to.
for example: texting
if texting came befor the telephone, who in their right mind would choose to text when they could speak directly to the person they wanted to contact…an activity that is product driven
or the marble countertop
a central feature in all the home ‘upgrade’ shows…which is actually quite unsanitary because the pores collect bacteria…now a must to sell your home…’my house is worth what?’…lets figure out how much my house is worth so i can pull every last penny of equity out
what you need is what they are sellin…..(rage against the machine)
While there is certainly some truth in this article, I believe that an essential point is missed. The basic character of the US as a command economy has been in place for quite a while. In recent decades global economic activity has been so dominated by a small number of huge corporations that for practical purposes it has already functioned as a “planned economy”. A true market economy, with all the virtues that people like to attribute to it, relies on competition between a multiplicity of small enterprises, not a handful of massive players that dominate their sector of the economy and have grossly disproportionate access to political power. The line between corporate power and political power has already been blurred — its just becoming more blatant now.
I get frustrated with people on the right and left who are so quick to blame the government — which at least for now has a vital role in society — but fail to miss the point that corporate capitalism and true democracy are incompatible. The kind of superficial critiques that are incessantly repeated on so called “conservative” talk radio, TV, etc… leave the “corpocracy” unscathed. I encourage people who really believe in a market economy to think not just of how to disempower government, but how to disentangle corporate power and government. (see for example, David Korten’s “When Corporations Rule the World”, and the “Post-Corporate World”)
Finally, don’t get me wrong — the government is out of control, and the current payoffs to the banks and finance industry are disgusting.
“Free economies produce prosperity; command economies produce poverty.” There’s a laugh here!
Looking at how America’s “free economy” has bankrupted not just America but fair portion of the world, I would say a lets give a command economy a try for a while, maybe there won’t be so many people without jobs, shelter, health care and food as there are now after a decade of very bad decisions made by “the free market”.
“In a free economy goods and services are bought and sold by consent; business transactions are based on agreement; contracts depend upon a meeting of the minds of the parties involved. In a command economy government sets prices, controls and directs resources, and oversees production and consumption. ”
As far as I can make out, we live in a society commanded by banks, credit agencies, insurance companies, etc. Woe betide those trying to find a job, housing, insurance or healthcare without a credit report., for example. (And woe betide those even more who try to correct mistakes in their report).
Stop blowing smoke about our free economy–we have not had one in decades. If you are asmall business rather than a leviathan, you already know this.
[...] I seriously doubt we can switch to totalitarian socialism in time to save lives in this country. We’re already too deep into fascism to switch horses. At this point, the sheeple probably would go along, but the corporations would not. Ours is a command economy, and the commands come from the corporations: If they tell legislators to vote for an initial $700 billion bailout package, you can bet how it will turn out: “in no time the taxpayers ended up with more than eighteen times that, $12.8 trillion in loans, sp… [...]
[...] to a free economy—according to economist and author of The Dollar Meltdown Charles Goyette in an article for Whiskey & Gunpowder, “A command economy is a top-down, state-controlled eocnomy directed by planners and [...]